Structured support for IEC 61508, ISO 13849, and related frameworks — hazard analysis, safety requirements, architecture advice, and evidence packs that stand up to assessment.
Define required SIL/PL from real risk reduction needs.
Avoid treating firmware as an afterthought to the safety case.
Organize arguments and artifacts assessors expect to see.
We do not list every acronym for show. These are the frameworks this service typically engages — scoped to your product after a short intake.
Generic functional safety for E/E/PE systems.
Safety-related parts of control systems — PL approach.
Functional safety of safety-related control systems.
Automotive FS engagements where in scope.
Diagnostic coverage and failure metric support.
Integration guidance for safety components.
Product, markets, and claims — we define what must be true to sell legally.
Design, labeling, and evidence gaps before you spend on formal testing.
Lab coordination, failure triage, and efficient retest planning.
Documentation pack, declarations, and change-control advice.
Independent assessment is typically done by a qualified assessor/body. We prepare the engineering case and close gaps before that review.
No — medical, energy, robotics, and process industries all use FS frameworks when harm depends on control systems.
Machinery risk assessment and FS of control systems often travel together. We align both tracks.
Tell us about the product and target markets. We will reply with a clear next step — usually a 30-minute scoping call.